Monday, October 12, 2009

Congressman Seeks to Raise FHA minimun Down Payments!!

I don't know about your business but in my Mortgage Practice 90+ percent of my clients are utilizing FHA financing. First Time Home Buyers especially, its at 98%. If congress passes this bill it would severely hurt the First Time Home Buyer market!!! See article below:

As reported by DSNews: http://www.dsnews.com/articles/congressman-seeks-to-raise-fha-down-payments-2009-10-02
A bill introduced in the House of Representatives Thursday aims to limit defaults on mortgages backed by the Federal Housing Administration by further tightening standards on borrowers.

The bill, sponsored and introduced by Rep. Scott Garrett (R.-New Jersey), would raise the minimum down payment on FHA loans to 5 percent of the principal, from its current minimum of 3.5 percent. The bill also would restrict borrowers from using FHA loan money to cover their closing costs.
Both moves are intended to stem defaults and foreclosures on FHA-guaranteed loans, which are guaranteed by federal funds if borrowers can’t pay. Since the beginning of the housing crisis, concern has grown among politicians and market analysts about the FHA’s ability to pay out on massive defaults.
That’s because FHA financing has exploded in popularity, especially among less-than-stellar borrowers, as credit markets tightened in the downturn and lenders cracked down on subprime and Alt-A loans. FHA loans accounted for less than 5 percent of all U.S. mortgages at the height of the boom in 2005 and 2006; by this year, more than 20 percent of all new loans were FHA guaranteed, according to FHA figures.
Worries about the guaranteed loans intensified in the past month after federal officials indicated that the FHA’s cash reserves would dip below their legally mandated level of 2 percent of FHA-backed loans. That’s chiefly a result of the accelerated pace of lending, but it also reflects a higher rate of problems with FHA borrowers. The rate of serious delinquencies on government-backed mortgages jumped to 7.5 percent in the second quarter of 2009, a 16 percent rise since the beginning of the year, according to statistics from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency this week.
The FHA is fast becoming a substitute for “the riskier part of the mortgage market,” Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke told Congress at a hearing on Capitol Hill Thursday. “It’s the only source of mortgages where down payments can be less than basically 20%. And so it is providing mortgage access to a large number of people who could not otherwise buy homes.”
Yet despite FHA’s historical role as a safety valve for new buyers and credit rebuilders, Congress has recently wondered whether FHA’s easy lending is too risky, and whether it could end up costing taxpayers more in the long run. Last year, lawmakers approved a hike in the down-payment requirement to 3.5 percent from 3 percent, and closed a loophole that let sellers cover a purchaser’s down payment. Studies show that borrowers who put less money down are likelier to default in the life of a mortgage.
Republicans made that point in questioning Bernanke Thursday, but he underscored that a balance ultimately needed to be struck between lending risk and credit availability for deserving but needy borrowers.
“You could make the conditions tougher and tougher,” he said, but “that reduces the risk to the taxpayer, absolutely. And it reduces the number of people who can get mortgages.”
A full report on the FHA’s financial state is expected in the coming weeks. A spokesman for agency responded to the Republicans’ concerns and the new bill in a statement Thursday.
“As FHA is key to the housing recovery, we would urge Congress not to take precipitous action while we are awaiting the full details of the independent actuarial study,” it said.



Fed Report Shows One in Three Mortgage Applications Denied

DSNews.com Reporting...

Nearly a third of all borrowers who applied for a home loan last year – including new homebuyers and existing homeowners looking to refinance – were turned down, according to the Federal Reserve’s recently released annual report on home-lending activity.

The U.S. central bank found that denials were even higher for minorities. The rejection rate for all home loans was about 32 percent last year – about the same as in 2007 – but when looking at just black and Hispanic borrowers, the Fed said the denial rate was more than twice as high as the rate for white borrowers.
The Federal Reserve said the 2008 numbers reflect a turbulent year in the mortgage market following the housing bust, as related losses prompted a pullback by investors and threatened to push many of the nation’s financial institutions into the distressed column.
Overall, reported loan application and origination volumes fell sharply from 2007 to 2008 – down by a third – after already dropping considerably from 2006 to 2007. Mortgage activity in 2008 was half the level reached in 2006, the Fed’s data shows.
As DSNews.com has previously reported, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) has picked up the slack as private lending has slowed. The Federal Reserve’s report puts the FHA-share of mortgage activity at 21 percent of all loans made in 2008 – up from less than 5 percent as recently as 2006.
The FHA backed more than half of the loans issued to black borrowers in 2008, and 45 percent of those made to Hispanics – a finding that many consumer advocacy and fair lending groups find disconcerting.
The Federal Reserve said in its report that high-priced subprime loans – which reflect mortgages with rates at least 3 percentage points above the rate for prime loans – for the most part, disappeared from the market in 2008. Last year, about 17 percent of blacks and 15 percent of Hispanics received these so-called high-priced mortgages, compared with 7 percent of whites.
According to the Associated Press, the mortgage industry maintains that lenders are not discriminating by race, but are instead making adjustments based on borrowers’ risk profile – such as their credit score and the size of their down payments. The disproportionate numbers may also reflect larger ratios of minority borrowers who took out subprime loans during the housing boom and found themselves unable to refinance when property values crashed.
“You still have a certain degree of risk-based pricing in the market,” Jay Brinkmann, chief economist for the Mortgage Bankers Association, told the AP.
The Fed also reported that mortgages termed “piggyback,” in which borrowers use a second lien in place of a downpayment, have essentially died out. Only 98,000 of such loans were made last year, down from 1.3 million in 2006



Sunday, October 4, 2009

Why Rural housing???? 100% Financing baby!!!

  1. 100% financing of the sales price!!!!
  2. Actually, if the house appraises for more you can use the appraised value as the base loan!!! Yes, that is correct!!! That means we can roll some closing costs into the loan!
  3. If repairs are needed this loan can roll the repairs into the loan!!!!

Does your listing qualify for Rural Housing? Is your client looking in Rural Housing areas? You would be surprised at what's classified as Rural.

Use this property eligibility link to see:http://eligibility.sc.egov.usda.gov/eligibility/welcomeAction.do

There are many other restrictions on this Rural Housing program please give me a call to explore the possibilities, 804-615-7773, kjacocks@union-mtg.com